In 2017, Amazon allocated about $ 250 million to obtain the rights to produce a new version of “The Lord of the Rings”. At that time, with the end of “Game of Thrones” approaching, the search for a replacement for him began. Five years later, much speculation and doubt, the world created by JRR Tolkien invades Prime Video screens in the platform’s most ambitious investment yet.
This ambition is primarily financial, but also extends to adaptive history and investments in production. For the first season of just eight episodes, production spent about $468 million, according to documents the New Zealand government sent to Time magazine.
With pre-production beginning for season two and filming scheduled for October, Prime Video’s investment will exceed an estimated $1 billion in the five seasons already confirmed.
Result starts to come in from 10pm next Thursday, September 1st. The series, directed by duo Patrick McKay and J.D. Payne, is adapted for the second on-screen era, and takes place thousands of years before the events of “The Hobbit” and “The Lord of the Rings.”
It is a time of relative peace and great power, when kingdoms have risen and fallen. In that sense, the series follows a group of characters, both new and familiar, who must come together to confront the return of evil in its scariest form. Therefore, the plot will deal with the formation of rings of power, the appearance of Sauron and the alliance between men and elves.
Subscribe to Amazon Prime Video to watch “The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power”
In Tolkien’s writings, the second age spans 3,441 years, and the series borrows elements from different passages to create an orderly, more graceful narrative line.
Even without the rights to “The Silmarillion,” “The Unfinished Tales,” and “The History of Middle-earth,” the series is working in partnership with Tolkien’s property to present this part of the fantasy world in the best possible light.
The result, visually stunning, lives up to the exorbitant outlay of the company led by Jeff Bezos. Photography in New Zealand prioritizes sets built using computer graphics, and artistic curation with costumes, makeup, sets and visual effects is evident.
In the first two episodes, directed by J.A. Bayona (“Seven Minutes After Midnight,” “Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom”), the series showcases the various cores and travels from city to city to quietly tell who these audiences should pay attention to.
From elves to humans, dwarves, and hairy feet, types of hobbit ancestors, each core has its own plays, struggles, and missions, which will soon enter the path of convergence.
Although they do a good introductory job, the episodes spend no more than a screen with a paragraph and a few lines of dialogue explaining their premise and making clear that there are prior conflicts that are important to understanding the plot from that point on.
At first, its biggest difficulty seems to be reconciling two equally important angles: making the adaptation satisfying enough for more familiar audiences in Tolkien’s world and welcoming enough that the casual viewer can enjoy the plot without getting lost a bit.
This becomes especially difficult when you consider the “Lord of the Rings: Rings of Power” press. To date, it is the most expensive series in the history of television.
By comparison, “Game of Thrones” cost HBO about $100 million per season, with per-episode spending starting at about $6 million in the first season, and rising to $15 million in the final season. According to Variety, “House of the Dragon” took in less than $20 million for each of the first season’s 10 episodes, leaving a budget of less than half of the first season’s budget for Episodes of Power.
Precisely because of the rampant spending, which comes at a time when the streaming platform’s major competitors (read HBO Max and Netflix) are turning in the opposite direction to cost containment, the show’s performance in audience confrontation, and your ability to capture the attention of Emmy experts and potential new fans even more. important than ever.
In that sense, by comparison, the series takes a much steeper trajectory than HBO’s fire-breathing dragons.
However, the visual spectacle provided by “The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power” is one of the most dazzling performances ever on television, and in no way harks back to the greatness of Peter Jackson’s films.
Even with the naturally confusing beginning, which naturally comes to a story with such a large and branching scope, the characters are well-designed enough that the distinction between them is clear.
And even in the face of big challenges, like that of Morvid Clarke, Galadriel’s younger and more adventurous translator, the actors were able to show that they would still surprise us — and a lot.
UOL may receive a portion of sales through recommended links in this content. Store prices and offers do not affect the editor’s selection criteria.
#Lord #Rings #Rings #Power #biggest #show #year